The 70-200mm f/2.8 S continues to put up excellent sharpness numbers that are only slightly lower than before, while the 24-200mm looks pretty uninspiring even compared to its own performance at earlier focal lengths. It’s still within the bounds of acceptable, but the 70-200mm is within the bounds of excellent.
Like the Z range cameras and other lenses, the 24-70mm f/2.8 lens is fully weather-sealed and also includes a fluorine coating for repelling water, dust and dirt. At the time of writing, the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S lens retails for around £2,199, making it the most expensive lens in the Z line-up to date.
MTF Curves. Today we’re comparing the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 Mk II L, the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC, and the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 AF-S lenses. As we’ve been doing, the MTF curves are the average of 10 copies at each lens, with each copy tested at 4 different rotations. Each lens is tested at both ends of the zoom range and in the center of the 13 1 5. 2. It looks like the focus target in your first image is not fully perpendicular to the film plane, as the left side is noticeably softer than the right. It is less likely that this is a lens fault than positioning error, though the former is certainly possible. – HamishKL.Elevated by a new Multi-Focus System, next generation lens flare correction and advanced S-Line features and functionality, the NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S is a must-have lens that marks the sweet spot of performance, precision and optical superiority.lkZ1Tg.